Jump to content

Talk:Prince Rostislav Romanov (born 1985)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Claim to throne

[edit]

It is simply not correct that "As one of the youngest male members of the Imperial Family, Rostislav could also one day be an heir to the defunct Russian throne". Whether or not he has a claim to the throne depends on genealogy, not how young he is!Royalcourtier (talk) 09:56, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All of his male cousins ahead of him in line are elderly or middle aged and son less so its likely the succession will pass to him in time. - dwc lr (talk) 17:04, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Succession won't pass to any of them, the throne is defunct. Fzknarish (talk) 13:42, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Prince Rostislav Romanov (born 1985). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:10, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ivan II not Ivan III

[edit]

Ivan III has no living descendants from either of his wives- his line died out in the 1600's. The ancestor of the Galitzine family and Prince Rostislav Romanoff is Ivan II of Moscow and his wife Aleksandra Vasilievna Veliaminova. Their granddaughter Anna of Moscow married Prince Yury Patrikeievich, and they are the ancestors of the Galitzines. Also, the sources listed do not show Ivan III as the ancestor of the Galitzines. I would like to remove this from the article and have provided below sources that prove my point. Thoughts?

https://www.genealogics.org/getperson.php?personID=I00295162&tree=LEO.

http://w.genealogy.euweb.cz/russia/rurik15.html.

https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/RUSSIA,%20Rurik.htm#_Toc481496241. 2600:8800:2191:2400:756A:32E5:9B62:89CE (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, so for clarification, it is not true that Ivan III's line died out in the 1600s. The connection is the following: the ancestor of all living Galitzines, Andrey Andreevich d.1638, was the son of Irina Ivanovna Mstislavskaya d. 1621, daughter of van Fedorovich Mstislavsky d. 1586, son of Anastasia Petrovna Ibragimovna, Princess of Khazan d. 1541, daughter of the Khazar Prince Khudai-Kul and Eudokia Ivanovna of Moscow (1492-1513), daughter of Ivan III and Sophia Palaiologina. This information is available on this source (The offspring of Rurik. A complete list of princes and nobles, the descendants of Rurik - the first Russian prince, founder of the Rurik dynasty and Russian statehood, relatively published to date / Comp.: AN Sokolov, mitrofor. protoyer. - 2nd ed., Rev. and additional - N. Novgorod, 2007 .-- 936 p. - P.206.) as well as the Russian Wikipedia page on the House of Galitzine. It is also interesting that the mother of Prince Andrew Romanov (1923-2021), Donna Elisabetha di Sasso Ruffo was a descendant of Andrey Andreevich through the Stroganov family..... 217.240.151.112 (talk) 20:50, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]