Talk:Phil Scott/Archive 1

Archive 1

FYI - It's "Philip" with one "L".

I don't remember how to fix that, and don't have the time, but there you go.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS388US388&q=%22philip+scott%22+site:vt.us&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai= —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.197.168.194 (talk) 19:49, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Phil Scott.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Phil Scott.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Phil Scott.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:16, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

My recent edit incorrectly tagged for BLP or vandalism

My recent edit to this page was tagged as possible BLP for vandalism. All I did was add policy positions on economic development, health care, sex/violent crime, and education issues. There was no BLP or vandalism. All citations were credible, as most of them were directly from the Vermont Legislature's website. Can someone remove this tag so that my edits can be publicly reflected on the article page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chuckduck764 (talk • contribs) 18:16, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Chuckduck764 The tag was placed by an automatic process known as an edit filter, which picks up on certain key words and phrases which may indicate a problematic edit. I don't think the tag on the edit summary can be removed, but experienced editors will know that these edit filters sometimes produce "false positives" and flag up edits that are in fact valid, as yours appears to be. You may if you wish report the case here: Noyster (talk), 00:06, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you Noyster Chuckduck764 (talk) 02:14, 1 May 2016 (UTC)