Talk:Nvidia Parabricks

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Medical genetics task force.

Molecular Biology: Genetics

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force.

Software: Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Article review

The article is very well written. I made a few improvements by enhancing the captions of two pictures and adjusting a sentence for better readability. Wikisosh (talk) 12:52, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Beatrice Branchini (talk) 13:31, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article reviewer 2

The article is well-written and interesting; I found the topic truly engaging. The images help clarifying the topic.

The are the small things I would suggest to do or that I have done:

Add a small logo, if available about Parabricks
I've fixed the bullet list

Gianaccordi (talk) 13:46, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions! Unfortunately, I did not find a logo for Parabricks. If NVIDIA releases it in the next future, I'll add it for sure! Beatrice Branchini (talk) 13:50, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer 3

The article is very well written. Your use of English is outstanding. I just fixed very small details. Good luck for your final evaluation! SergioCarlosMiguel (talk) 14:59, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Outstanding work there - very high quality article and very well put together.

Aszx5000 (talk) 15:47, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Observations and suggestions for improvements

The following observations and suggestions for improvements were collected, following an expert review of the article within the Science, Technology, Society and Wikipedia course at the Politecnico di Milano, in July 2024.

The pure list of tools is meaningless without a short description of what they are or a link to where it can be found.

--Aandurro (talk) 12:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]