Jump to content

Talk:Mount Tarumae

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Mount Tarumae/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I believe this should be a Start/High rating - based on level of former eruptions and likelihood to erupt in near future. Additionaly Tarumae is a rare triple volcano and has been classed 'A' in Japan due to its high levels of activity —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kunchan (talkcontribs) 22:22, October 1, 2007
  • Nope, it's an advanced stub at this point. Need to fill out the infobox more, at least providing the coordinates and age. Also, a name translation would be helpful. The Volcano project might rate it as High but as a mountain, not significant in height nor elevation ranking in the country. RedWolf 02:15, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 02:15, 2 October 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 00:32, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mount Tarumae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:52, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]