Jump to content

Talk:LG G2/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Numbermaniac (talk · contribs) 05:04, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I'd review this for GA status. First impressions are that it's pretty neat, and should be capable of passing. -- t numbermaniac c 05:15, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
    There's a few typos here and there, but nothing major to pick on as far as I've seen.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    I'm worried about a lack of references in the lead section of this article, however this shouldn't be too much of a problem as the references are provided later in the article.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
    A good range of technical sources used for this article to describe the topic.
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
    A lot of detail provided, but not too much.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    Both sides of the argument given to this phone and its features.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    Seems relatively stable.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    Both free and have CC licenses attached.
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    This is a good article. Pass.