Jump to content

Talk:Kraków/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 12:54, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments

[edit]

My initial impressions, after skim-reading this article a couple of times, is that: it's comprehensive, wide-ranging and well referenced. I don't yet see anything obvious missing. So, it appears to be GA material.

I'm now going to be spending the next few days going through the article. I will be going through it section by section, but leaving the WP:Lead until last. Depending on what I find, I may only post corrective actions; but we will have a wait and see. Pyrotec (talk) 18:27, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Overall summary

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


A comprehesnsive, wide-ranging, well-referenced article.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Well illustrated
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Congratulations on the quality of the article. I'm awarding GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 18:47, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]