Jump to content

Talk:Interstate 80 in Iowa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleInterstate 80 in Iowa is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 21, 2018.
Did You KnowOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 11, 2012Good article nomineeListed
October 16, 2012WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
October 25, 2012Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 21, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that about one-third of Iowa's population lives along the I-80 corridor?
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 21, 2023, and September 21, 2024.
Current status: Featured article


Comprehensiveness

[edit]

Anything since the 1980s? Any new developments, or is the interstate still in poor shape? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:41, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Parts of the highway have been patched up or repaired since then, but nowhere near the scale of the repairs, or of the news coverage, as in the 1980s. –Fredddie 17:24, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Auxiliary Routes

[edit]

So what do you have against including a section on I-80's auxiliary routes in Iowa? Other pages for the major Interstates in specific states include their auxiliary routes, and I see no reason not to include one for I-80 in Iowa. --JoBrLa (talk) 02:14, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Fredddie, the person who did all of the heavy lifting to get this article to FA status, was the one that stripped out the section, saying a navbox would be a better option. I just added {{I-80 aux}} to the bottom of the article. That said, I've taken two primary Interstate articles through FA (I-96 and I-75 in MI), and each as a prose section rather than a bulleted list that summarizes the auxiliary Interstates and business routes. I would support adding some sort of brief section, but edit warring to force something reverted out is the wrong way to go about this. Imzadi 1979  02:24, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly. Furthermore, adding anything that is poorly formatted to a featured article is a very bad thing to do. --Rschen7754 02:48, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I removed it because it was not cited in addition to everything else. –Fredddie 04:22, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
So what you're telling me is that this is a format issue? What is the appropriate format for such a list, and how can I include info on I-80's auxiliary routes in Iowa in a way that follows the format guidelines? I'm not here to ruin the article; I'm here to make it better. --JoBrLa (talk) 11:58, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't really need anything. If it did, someone has already mentioned it at GAN, ACR, and at FAC. –Fredddie 13:01, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

US 6 overlap in Council Bluffs

[edit]

So far, there doesn't seem to be any evidence that US 6 is now overlapping I-80/I-29 in Council Bluffs. I have yet to see any articles that explicitly state that US 6 was realigned there. In fact, as of November 2016, US 6 is still signed as following Broadway/Kanesville Blvd. Even Google Maps seems to indicate that this is the case. Just because IowaDOT has turned Broadway/Kanesville over to Council Bluffs doesn't mean that the US highway itself won't still follow that same route. For that matter, the decommissioning of Iowa 192 seems questionable as well, as there are still signs for that road at junctions with such highways US 6 and I-29/I-80. Greggens (talk) 23:03, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Interstate 80 in Iowa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:05, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Interstate 80 in Iowa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:20, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons tag

[edit]

Every other state-specific Interstate 80 article has a commons tag added to the external links section (unless there are others I've missed). I'm surprised that I'd have to ask permission to edit this one in order to add the tag, so I really hope nobody minds if I do that. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 12:23, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weird. I never noticed. It's added now. –Fredddie 00:12, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]