Talk:Imagocracy

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Media Top‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

Top

This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Politics Top‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sources exist

I know there are papers and book chapter out there that use and at least briefly describe the theory of informational autocracy. I encourage reviewing Google Scholar results and screening out the many theses/dissertations/conference papers/preprints. Chapter 8 of Formal Models of Domestic Politics has a section on IA. This analysis piece from the Washington Post is independent of the theory's authors and gives a one-paragraph explanation before using IA to analyze Belarus. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:38, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but in Fujimori's time that technology did not exist. Only traditional media existed. And the fact that a regime is only supported by the "least intelligent" sector of the country —You'll tell me how that is supposed to be measured— seems to me to be a rather arbitrary criterion. ComradeHektor (talk) 23:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Almost the entire article is based on 3 authors

Not only that, there are already better and less ambiguous or arbitrary terms (like Ideocracy, Mass politics or Totalitarianism). Furthermore, almost the entire article focuses on a single government —due to its lack of uses in other contexts—. There are also no retroactive attributions. ComradeHektor (talk) 22:51, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]