Jump to content

Talk:Hong Kong mainland China driving scheme

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

One-sided article

[edit]

Currently this article is quite one-sided, only detailing the opposition side and not mentioning other views. The common arguments from the opposition sides themselves barely make sense:

  • "mainlanders will pollute the city" - isn't HK already polluted to death?
  • "mainlanders will clog the roads" - aren't HK roads already clogged? (keep in mind that the mainland ad hoc quota is 50 per day, in other words, "spitting in an ocean of spit")
  • "mainlanders drive dangerously" - and HK drivers aren't dangerous, horrible drivers?
  • "mainlanders use different road rules" - incoming mainlanders need to pass a test.

The article currently only seems to give off a "this is bad, look at all these people protesting" vibe. The HK and Guangdong authorities have given press releases citing accident rate figures and the likes which refute the concerns - certainly there should be detailed mention of those as well. -- 李博杰  | Talk contribs email 17:45, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hong Kong mainland China driving scheme. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:23, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]