Talk:Hapsidophyllas
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Proposed merge of Hapsidophyllas flexibilis with Hapsidophyllas
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was to merge. YorkshireExpat (talk) 21:23, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
The genus has only one described species. See WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA. William Avery (talk) 15:14, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support: per nom. Scorpions13256 (talk) 20:12, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support: Name of the article should be Hapsidophyllas. YorkshireExpat (talk) 18:32, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Reference
[edit]Shouldn't this reference be included into the article https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12542-020-00537-4? Since it practically gives insight into the ecology of H. flexibilis and also gives a ton of information regarding the description of it. Rugoconites Tenuirugosus (talk) 20:34, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class animal articles
- Low-importance animal articles
- Wikipedia requested images of animals
- WikiProject Animals articles
- Stub-Class Palaeontology articles
- Low-importance Palaeontology articles
- Stub-Class Palaeontology articles of Low-importance
- Wikipedia requested images of palaeontology
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles