Jump to content

Talk:Guido von List/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: J Milburn (talk · contribs) 20:29, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Looks like an interesting one. Happy to offer a review, but I may not get all the way through it tonight. Josh Milburn (talk) 20:29, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • First: Your sources all seem excellent. Most of your authors have Wikipedia articles- wikilinks might be helpful (especially for those books by academics but with smaller publishers)
  • "Thus, on an 1862 visit to the catacombs with his father, he knelt before a ruined altar and swore that when an adult he would construct a temple to the ancient god Wotan." How sure are we that this happened? It sounds like the kind of thing that someone might have made up later. Similar with the wine bottles. (The way you tell the latter story comes across as a little prosaic, rather than documentary.)
  • Not the biggest deal, but there's some inconsistency as to whether you translate titles. "Die Juden als Staat und Nation" is a particular example of one that could be translated
  • Theosophical Society is mentioned in the lead but nowhere else. There's no mention of Theosophy in the biography section, either
    • I've added a mention of the Theosophical Society into the Biography section. It seems apparent from Goodrick-Clarke's account that while List was never actively involved in the Society, he was very clearly influenced by its publications, hence why there is far greater discussion of it in the "Ideology" section than in the "Biography". Midnightblueowl (talk) 21:38, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • "but rather on ideas that he received as a result of clairvoyant illumination" Given that the existence of clairvoyance is (to be polite) unproven, I think this is a little uncritical
  • "Freemasons and Rosicrucianism" Is Rosicrucianism the name of the organisation? Or should this perhaps be something like "through later esoteric traditions such as Freemasonry and Rosicrucianism"?

I still need to look at a few bits (not least the images), but that's what I'm seeing on my first read-through. A very interesting read. You generally do a good job of presenting him in "neutral" way. Josh Milburn (talk) 21:48, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning the images... I've had a play around, including with File:Deutsch Mythologische Landschaftsbilder2Page523.jpg, but given the date given on File:Deutsch MythologischeLandschaftsbilder2ndVolume.jpg, I'm now less sure. Do you happen to have a copy of the book? I think the information needs to be clarified. I'm pretty certain that they're PD, we just need to be clear on why. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:46, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have a copy of the book in question, I'm afraid. I'll take a look, but copyright issues aren't my strong point! Midnightblueowl (talk) 21:49, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've messed around with them, including the same PD statements in both and giving one of the pictures a Summary. Midnightblueowl (talk) 21:58, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's resolved my worries- thanks! Josh Milburn (talk) 11:14, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
And another quick thought- categories as an author and playwright? Journalist? There are possibly also nationalist categories that he belongs in. Category:Pseudohistorians would be another good one! Josh Milburn (talk) 21:17, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've added the "Pseudohistorians" category as I think that that's a good idea. I've also added "Journalist" and "Playwright" categories too! Midnightblueowl (talk) 21:44, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for undertaking this review, Josh! I hope that you enjoyed reading the article. Midnightblueowl (talk) 21:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Another quick comment... You link Wotanism to Heathenry (new religious movement); we have an article about a (seemingly separate) movement at Wotanism, but I note that Wotanism (Guido von List) currently redirects to Ariosophy. Something seems to be wrong somewhere, but I'm not sure what. Josh Milburn (talk) 22:45, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I linked to Heathenry (new religious movement) intentionally, because I thought that that was probably the best place for it. As you pointed out, the "Wotanism" article links to the ideology of the Wotansvolk Neo-Nazi group, which isn't really appropriate (although they were influenced by List, I think). However, List's work was an early form of Heathenry (before the term "Heathenry" had ever come to be used for this movement) so I do think that the link is appropriate. Best, Midnightblueowl (talk) 23:36, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'm going to go ahead and promote now, because I think this article's great- very well written and immaculately sourced and illustrated, with an appropriately scholarly, neutral tone. Though I think this makes an excellent GA, I must clarify that I would be nervous about supporting this at FAC at this time (if you were thinking of taking this to the next level) for the simple reason that I suspect that there will be some good sources available in the German language. I appreciate that this makes it very difficult for people without access to these kinds of sources, but such is the nature of research, I fear! If we had good reason to believe that there was no high-quality scholarly research in German (which is, I think, unlikely) then I could likely support. (I've been through this myself: I considered Nietzsche as a subject for my PhD research, and one reason among several that I decided not to pursue it was precisely that I've no grasp of German, meaning I wouldn't be able to read his works as originally written or a good hunk of Nietzsche scholarship.) From my cursory Googling around, I think you're already citing an impressive number of sources. Anyway, I'm promoting now. Josh Milburn (talk) 11:14, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've placed the article in Wikipedia:Good_articles/Philosophy and religion#Religious figures and leaders. I have no objection if you wish to switch it to some other category. Josh Milburn (talk) 11:21, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]