Talk:Grok (chatbot)
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Written in Rust
[edit]The sidebar says "Written in Rust" citing a primary source (https://x.ai/). Is this not contrary to Wikipedia guidelines? Do we not require a secondary source? Tadreidms (talk) 21:02, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
- No, WP:PRIMARY is fine for
straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge
. It's only when primary sources start getting promotional, contentious or potentially libelous that it becomes a problem. Belbury (talk) 21:09, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Redirect of Licence
[edit]The licence redirects to open software wikipedia page I am unable to understand is this a typo or something else , it should redirect to 'apache' wikipedia Steven Willers (talk) 11:49, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Done, target should have been Apache License. Belbury (talk) 14:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)