Jump to content

Talk:Green iguana in captivity

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content discussion

[edit]

This is one of only two special articles on "Pet reptiles" in Wikipedia. This article was once merged with Green Iguana. However, it was decided that the true Encyclopedic content was in question. I, as the main contributing author (however, co-author), agreed. The article will be under review as it is decided if it has a place in Wikipedia.--Adio11 06:50, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help Needed

[edit]

This article needs some help. If you have the expertise to edit this page to improve it, please do so. --Adio11 05:24, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite

[edit]

This article needs a complete rewrite. It is not a Wikipedia article by any definition, and I suggest it be deleted unless someone with the expertise can help it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.189.178.102 (talkcontribs) 04:00, 24 July 2007

In the future, please be kind enough to sign your comment, or it cannot be considered. At the moment it is being reviewed, but no one has the expertise to re-write it, thank you.--Adio11 00:36, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There's really no reason at all for this to be a standalone article, and when it's eventually rewritten I assume that whatever section of it is considered to be encyclopedic content will be reinserted into the main creature article. That doesn't excuse the not-signing, mind. Chris Cunningham 06:09, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll help with the rewrite, but I think it needs to be a team effort. There is plenty of good printed source material. The article does seem to weigh heavily on web sources.--Mike Searson 04:31, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've pretty much done what I can, I can help more if needed. I always prefer the original editors to take charge of their changes, etc.--Mike Searson 14:10, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MERGE?

[edit]

I think the major elements from this article are present in the main article. I would not be against merging the two as I've worked on both and the primary author for the captivity article has also contributed to both. However, I don't want to do that right now for a few reasons. Here are my reccomendatins before doing it:

  • Green Iguana in captivity finishes going through text cleanup/rewrite
  • Green iguana in captivity makes use of more print sources as opposed to web based articles.
  • Green iguana in captivity gets promoted to GA status, or at the very least gets reviewed and the reviewer reccomends a merge.
  • That the size of the merged article is manageable.

I don't think this is unreasonable.

My ultimate goal is to get Green Iguana promoted to Featured Status. So I'd rather work on this article and improve it...then do the merge. Make sense?--Mike Searson 14:49, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds great. Chris Cunningham 15:22, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've actually merged essentials from the introduction and the complete diet section, so far.--Mike Searson 15:39, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article is pretty much a word-for-word copy of information present in the main article. I don't think it so much needs to be merged as it is just unnecessary for this article to be here without any new information present. --Nukethwhls (talk) 19:59, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not exactly a copy. We had 2 parallel articles going, this one more like a "how-to guide". I deleted and rewrote much of it...this one could probably be deleted.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 03:59, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

De-tagged

[edit]

I've removed the remaining prescriptive comment and carried out some more copy-editing. I think this is good enough now that we can look ahead to getting it rated. Chris Cunningham (talk) 19:45, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Good job, I went ahead and merged the bulk of it back into Green iguana. Check it over when you get a chance!--Mike Searson (talk) 21:15, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Green iguana in captivity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:59, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Conservation biology

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 10 January 2023 and 21 April 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): BeckxStrap (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Ldonahue3254, Lylabutler.

— Assignment last updated by Ldonahue3254 (talk) 00:25, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]