Talk:Good (disambiguation)

Good as a Word?

I believe that the main problem with fixing links to this disambiguation page is that it seems that there is no page on Wikipedia that is a counterpart of 'evil'. Does anyone agree on this and should such a page be created? Or am I simply overlooking one? The goodness and value page is a lot more complicated than it needs to be and in some cases it's simply not what most people mean by 'good'.

The Hooded Man 00:31, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

fixing links and have a question

What the difference between the accounting sense, the economics sense and the business sense? Tedernst 19:02, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As far as a I can tell, accounting deals with actual physical "stuff," like the "goods" in "goods and sevices." I'm thinking inventory-- the beans the bean counters count.

Economic deals with a thing that is desired, whether it be physical or intangible. Kind of a cross between good and good (accounting). It appears to be irrelevant whether the thing is sold or not.

Business deals with a good or service that is sold.

At least that's what I got from their Wikipedia articles. If no one complains, that's how I'll disambig the remaning links in a day or so. D-Rock 00:31, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ALL THESE IS CRAP —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.232.50.154 (talk) 06:23, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why cant good have its own page?

Is goodness not force of its own?! Chavatshimshon 18:13, 4 December 2006 (UTC) avg 8MEH-RFR8J-PTS8Q-92ATA-04WHO-JEMBR-ACED — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.45.52.63 (talk) 15:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nomination

This is clearly a Good article. It's even in the name, what more could you want? CodeCat (talk) 02:04, 1 April 2014 (UTC) ^{[April Fools!]}[reply]

Hey, cut this crap out. There's no need to disrupt the serious Good Article Nomination process with something that's clearly destined for Featured Article status. Tezero (talk) 06:16, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]