Talk:Golden Days
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Requested move 19 October 2015
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved per consensus here, pending necessary G6 deletions. (non-admin closure) Tiggerjay (talk) 22:54, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
– I see no reason why the song is the primary topic of this phrase. I think "Golden Days" has a highly variable meaning, and that no article is the primary topic. 117Avenue (talk) 03:53, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support per nom -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 04:17, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support Golden Days (Bucks Fizz song), Tom Jones had a single of the same name in 1973; but the primary song if such a thing existed would be Golden Days (Mario Lanza song) etc. which now redirects to composer Sigmund Romberg's The Student Prince. In ictu oculi (talk) 05:29, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- Wow, there's at least five songs by the same name. This request really should have been brought up sooner. Thanks, 117Avenue (talk) 01:51, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support. Also, the song title requires disambiguation with the group name. older ≠ wiser 12:23, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support per above. - HyperGaruda (talk) 12:00, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support as proposed. Even being located at the base name "Golden Days", the song did not receive more page views than ambiguous titles: 625 vs. 329, 206, 281 and 402. However, I see no need to add the band without other articles on songs called "Golden Days".--Cúchullain t/c 17:53, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.