Talk:Fredy Clue/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Dugan Murphy (talk · contribs) 15:53, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 20:07, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'll be reviewing this article as part of the ongoing GAN backlog drive. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 20:07, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

There is unlikely any copyright violation in the article. Earwig's Copyvio Detector has reported only 8.3% in similarity.
There are no cleanup banners, such as those listed at WP:QF, in the article.
The article is stable.
No previous GA reviews.