Jump to content

Talk:Dan Scavino

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Birthdate?

[edit]

Can we get his actual birthdate? MaynardClark (talk) 15:58, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 15, 1976 (age 44 years) — Preceding unsigned comment added by UnkownXcupcake (talkcontribs) 02:57, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Say what?

[edit]

"In addition, Scavino managed his social platforms after creating the Trump train."

What is that supposed to mean, exactly? JanJasinski (talk) 18:19, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mention of the racist star is disputed in its cited reference

[edit]

The blurb implies that the pic of Hillary Clinton was a Star of David and came from a racist website. The link cited as a reference for this however portrays this as a disputed fact with the dispute being that the pic didn’t originate from that site and that the star is a “sheriff star” and not a Star of David. The text here should be modified to mention the disputed aspect as it’s cited reference indicates.

“Over July 4, 2016 weekend, controversy arose when Trump's Twitter account posted an image selected by Scavino of Hillary Clinton with a text in the shape of a Star of David calling her the "Most Corrupt Candidate Ever." The image had originally appeared on an anti-Semitic, white supremacist message board” Normana400 (talk) 21:43, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

“manipulated media” (was retweeted by Trump), add ?

[edit]

An altered video of Joe Biden shared by the White House and retweeted by Trump has been flagged as by Twitter. It’s the first test of the new policy implemented on March 5 to label tweets that include manipulated content, which includes everything from edited videos to full “deep fakes” of events that never actually happened. The altered video of Biden shows him stumbling through a speech, but cuts off after Biden accidentally says, “Excuse me. We can only reelect Donald Trump.” The video leaves out the rest of the quote: “We can only reelect Donald Trump if in fact we get engaged in this circular firing squad here. It’s gotta be a positive campaign.”

X1\ (talk) 08:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Adding https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-the-trump-campaign-came-to-court-qanon-the-online-conspiracy-movement-identified-by-the-fbi-as-a-violent-threat/2020/08/01/dd0ea9b4-d1d4-11ea-9038-af089b63ac21_story.html which is relevant to the above. As of 2022 there seems to be no mention of conspiracy theories or of QAnon. —PaleoNeonate22:28, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What does any of this have to do with Scavino's article? -ZimZalaBim talk 22:36, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]