Jump to content

Talk:Combatants of the Iraq War

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Combatants of the Iraq War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:53, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

[edit]

List of armed groups in the Iraqi Civil War should be merged into this article because the Iraqi Civil War is part of the Iraq War. Charles Essie (talk) 22:56, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. I don't support the idea that this is still the same conflict. Of course, the Iraqi Civil War is completely a result of the Iraq War, but it's still another conflict with other factions. Furthermore, there is also an own page for the Iraqi Civil War, which shouldn't exist after this logic, too. The other reason, why I'm against the merge is, that the Combatants of the Iraq War is a very messed-up place, especially the section Post-Invasion. With adding the content of the Iraqi Civil War, it only would become additionally complicated.--Ermanarich (talk) 14:20, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Acording to this discussion they are two parts of the same ongoing war. Charles Essie (talk) 15:31, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, you're right. But still, both parts of it remain clearly divided and so should it be - in my opinion - with the articles about the armed groups, since Kurdish and Shiite forces turned to be the official ones while Sunnis are mostly IS or other rebel groups. It's more clearly arranged then. But it would be good to link in both articles a link to the respectively other.--Ermanarich (talk) 16:56, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds sensible. Both articles need a lot of work though. They're both incomplete and out of date. Charles Essie (talk) 21:32, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That's true. I'm working at least on the civil war article to make it better. The problem there is, that the situation of the Sunni insurgents beyond IS is completely chaotic and difficult and there aren't many informations about them, as well as their numbers. And the different PMF-militias are mostly designated simply as "PMF" in the news.--Ermanarich (talk) 13:57, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Combatants of the Iraq War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:43, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Combatants of the Iraq War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:02, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]