Jump to content

Talk:Clwyd

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pronunciation

[edit]

...please, anyone? --BjKa (talk) 11:12, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Clwyd/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 17:49, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Great! Happy to help with this. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 17:49, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Lead:
  • No infobox here?
Dr. Blofeld removed it a few days ago with the edit summary "better without the hideous infobox". Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • one of eight counties in Wales Not clear if there were eight counties in Wales at the time or this was one of the eight that had county councils.
Clarified. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think "Romans", "Normans", "Act of Union", "English Crown" and "Chester" should be wikilinked.
Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Cheshire" is linked twice.
Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • The links in the lead can be repeated later.
  • History:
  • I think "Celtic" should be wikilinked
Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • "75 AD", "AD 400" use any one style.
Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Geography:
  • There are a lot of duplicate links, I think you can use this tool to fix them.
Removed about thirty from the whole article. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • The county of Clwyd in northeastern Wales Seems as if there are other such counties elsewhere.
Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Gwynnedd to the west, Powys to the south Would be good to add these are Welsh counties.
Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • What is a scarp slope?
Explained. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • The north central part "north-central"
Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • The population as of 2007 More recent figures available?
The Office for National Statistics produces data but it has a difficult to negotiate, useless website and I could not find any more recent figures. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Tourism is nowadays the main source of income in Clwyd The line "The economy of Clwyd depends on a mixture of industrial, agricultural and tourism activities" does not seem to highlight the significance of tourism in the economy.
Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Administrative history:
  • I think "coat of arms" should be wikilinked.
Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Landmarks:
  • I think "Neolithic" should be wikilinked.
Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Transport:
  • Betws-y-Coed Earlier you said "Betws y Coed"
Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Images: Perhaps a few images could be shifted to the left?
Done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, that should be it for now. Good luck! Sainsf <^>Feel at home 18:43, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking on this review. I think I have dealt with or commented on all the issues you raised. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the response. Looks good to go. Awesome job! Sainsf <^>Feel at home 10:48, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Clwyd. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:14, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clwyd. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Point of View / Citations

[edit]

In a couple of instances, the article appears to include a point of view without it being supported by any unambiguous citations. The article also states that tourism is the main economic sector in the area, again uncited, but appears unlikely based on the prevalence of industrial estates and the large commercial and retail centres within the area. WPCW (talk) 20:54, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]