Jump to content

Talk:City of Burnside

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposed Merger

[edit]
I see no reason why it can't be mentioned in both. I suggested a merger because I think it's a fair bet it'd end up on AfD otherwise. --cj | talk 13:57, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
yeah good point. I think I was envisaging a significant history section that would be more suited to the park article. ...maelgwntalk 00:52, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It will be mentioned in both but I'm going to be writing on the history of the swimming centre, preferably in the article itself. The political debacle to get it constructed is quite a story! michael talk 07:00, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The centre isn't notable enough to warrant an article. The centre and the local politics surrounding it could be discussed in this article.--cj | talk 05:24, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I'd rather discuss them in the Hazelwood Park, Adelaide article than anything else michael talk 06:05, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've redirected the swimming center article to the Hazelwood Park one. When I finish this page, it will get an entry - but not yet. michael talk 05:45, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on City of Burnside. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:03, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]