Jump to content

Talk:Chiswell

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled

[edit]

The articles about the eight villages on Portland are all stubs - wouldn't it be better if they were combined into one article about all eight villages? This article would still be separate from the main article called "Isle of Portland".

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Chiswell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:39, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chiswell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Community Trust

[edit]

This line was removed by anon on 28 Feb with the summary "removed false statement":

The village has been maintained by the Chiswell Community Trust since 2003.[1][2]

It was reverted by @David_J_Johnson, but I assume that's because the edit mangled the markup, alongside being an anon edit made without clear supporting evidence, rather than David taking issue specifically with removal of the community trust?

It caught my eye because the statement as I would interpret it (a voluntary Trust maintains everything in a settlement the size of Chiswell) does seem surprising. And anon does seem to have a point. The claim does not seem to be obviously supported by the references:

  1. ^ "The Chiswell Community Trust - Company number 04943736". Companies House. Retrieved 19 August 2020.
  2. ^ "Chiswell Community Trust, community website for the village of Chiswell on Portland". Chiswellcommunity.org. Archived from the original on 20 November 2008. Retrieved 25 November 2012.

My guess is that at best the original statement is too broad and ambiguous -- perhaps the trust does/did some odd jobs and projects, not maintain the entire village -- and should have been more specific. But given that the website domain registration has lapsed and there are any 3 current directors, I also guess it might no longer be an active organisation. And given anon's edit, it might never have been true. So I've deleted it.

I'm making a note of it here in case David or somebody else did know more and thinks it is important to keep in the article. But if it does stay, I suspect it needs more clarity on what exactly it does, and better references that are less reliant on primary sources created by the subject itself. Joe D (t) 08:01, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]