Jump to content

Talk:Captain (naval)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merger Proposal

[edit]

i porpose that Captain (United States O-6) be merged into Captain (naval). Why have two articles onthe same subject?--Petebutt (talk) 07:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Are you also going to propose that we merge Captain (Royal Navy), Kapitän zur See, and Ship-of-the-line captain to this article? - BilCat (talk) 07:54, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A proposition

[edit]

How about writing something about naval captains who are not corresponding to land colonels (for example in Poland)? I'm not sure, so I won't write this, but maybe it should be here. 93.105.56.218 (talk) 12:55, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Finland

[edit]

Actually, Finland has somewhat similar system than Poland. Why it is not mentioned? Equivalent rank is commodore (kommodori) and there is captain lieutenant (kapteeniluutnantti) which equals captain of land forces. 85.217.38.12 (talk) 00:01, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:08, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do we need multiple articles for every equivalent rank, like Kapitan zur See...

[edit]

The German rank Kapitän zur See, the rank equivalent to Naval Captain, redirects to its literal translation, Captain at sea#Germany. Why shouldn't it redirect here? Is there some duty a German Captain fulfills that justifies a separate article?

Captain of sea and war seems to be a literal translation of the equivalent rank's Portugese name. As above, why does it require a separate article.

And Ship-of-the-line captain, what's up with that? "Ship of the line" is a term that dates back to the fleet actions of sailing ships.

This article needs more references. But those other articles are completely unreferenced. This introduces the concern those articles contain the personal opinions of the wikipedia contributors who wrote them, not WP:reliable sources, as policy requires. Geo Swan (talk) 22:39, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Given no objections, for the 3 merge proposal,   checkY Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 15:25, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]