Talk:Bergdorf Goodman Building/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Epicgenius (talk · contribs) 00:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: TheNuggeteer (talk · contribs) 12:19, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Very large article, guess I'm going to review this. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 12:19, 4 September 2024 (UTC) By looking at this, this is a drive-by nom, did you get consensus from Epicgenius?

@TheNuggeteer, thanks for taking up the review. It's a self-drive-by nomination, for the avoidance of doubt. I nominated this article a few days after creating it (i even double checked to see if this wasn't accidentally nominated by someone else). Epicgenius (talk) 12:43, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Oh, came here from WP:GARC, thought Rollinginhisgrave was the nom, really sorry! 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 12:47, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Due to Rollinginhisgrave rejecting his review, I'm giving him this review if he agrees, just want to notify you. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 00:16, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

@TheNuggeteer, that sounds good. Thanks for the heads up. – Epicgenius (talk) 02:52, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Criteria 1

• Is the word 'women' supposed to be capitalized? (lead)
  • I'm not entirely sure. It's not technically a proper name; "women's store" is more of a descriptor. Epicgenius (talk) 13:32, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Spotcheck

1. Y
2. Y
3. Y - Accepted in good faith, offline
4. Y - Accepted in good faith, offline
5. Y
6. Y - You can include more information about the source.

   I have added publisher and volume info. Epicgenius (talk) 13:32, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

7. Y - Accepted in good faith, offline

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.