Jump to content

Talk:Arjen de Wolff

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nomination for deletion

[edit]

Arjen de Wolff does not seem to be qualified for Wikipedia. Most part of the article is promotional links from his own organization (Radio Zamaneh) and routine interviews with local newspapers in Amsterdam which are not quite important. His activities also are not something special. I think the article should be deleted.Leo71538 (talk) 14:19, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not well sourced

[edit]

Many parts of the article have no sources. It seems the user who has added the information is De Wolff himself or someone with close contact with him. Check out the user's edit history. There is a logo on the pic which is against Wikipedia rules.--Khafesho (talk) 16:50, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arjen de Wolff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:18, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]