Talk:Across the Bridge (short story)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Novels Stub‑class Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 13:29, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sections

Added plot section to fulfill cleanup.TheHappiestCritic (talk) 10:04, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

This article remains at a Start-Class. Here's the rationale:

Content coverage: The article provides a basic plot summary and details its publication history. However, it's missing critical background information on its themes, critical reception, and cultural significance.

References and sourcing: One citation is insufficient. A complete article should include more references, especially to secondary sources discussing the story's impact, critical reviews, and possibly analyses of Graham Greene's works.

Structure: The article follows a standard structure but lacks sections that could give it more depth, such as "Themes," "Background," or "Adaptations."

Length: The article is relatively short and lacks depth in discussing the story's significance in Greene’s body of work. Neutrality and tone: The tone and style are neutral and encyclopedic, appropriate for Wikipedia, but a more comprehensive analysis would enhance it.

Additional details, such as an exploration of the story's themes, critical reception, and influence, would be needed to improve the article to at least C-Class. Bookleo (talk) 12:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]