Jump to content

Talk:920th Air Refueling Squadron

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merger

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


They are not distinct, so why? --Lineagegeek (talk) 22:17, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Although the USAF considers the units to be the same, they have different names and missions and were active at different times. --Kkmurray (talk) 14:32, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 920th Air Refueling Squadron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:28, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

[edit]

Please use this space to discuss the proposed merge of 420th Bombardment Squadron into this article. Pinging @Buckshot06:. Joyous! Noise! 23:35, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Closing, given that no case has been made, there is no support, discussion is stale and a previous similar proposal failed in 2013 (those count-arguments still seem to hold). Klbrain (talk) 10:36, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]