Jump to content

Talk:2022 Bahrain Grand Prix/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Giraffer (talk · contribs) 15:39, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: DoctorWhoFan91 (talk · contribs) 18:03, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this one. P.S. I am reviewing a lot of GANs, so expect initial remarks in 24-48 hours. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 18:03, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect, thank you. Giraffer (talk) 19:29, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Background

[edit]
  • Regulation Changes- Remove first para
  • Driver changes- Valtteri Bottas ... the end of 2021, with: Axe, both this and above relate more to the season as a whole.(and change the grammar of the remaining para, of course)

Qualifying

[edit]
  • Q3/Para 3- Mention Perez as well, as he is the only one left in the top ten.

Race

[edit]
  • Add that Leclerc and Ferrari started leading the WDC, for the first and after this much time, and maybe how long they kept it in the season

Post-race

[edit]
  • Add that Ferrari was ecstatic perhaps; that seemed big at the moment, maybe there are reliable sources for it too?
  • Did these teams say anything else?
  • Did any other teams say anything else? Add if anything important was said.

References

[edit]
  • Are StatsF1 and f1destinations.com reliable?
  • Wikilink the ref sources everywhere or nowhere, per MOS:CONSISTENT
  • Use one of either Formula 1 or formula1.com, again per MOS:CONSISTENT
  • I'll do the spot-check later.

Overall

[edit]

@Giraffer:In general- Expand article wherever possible; add more detail wherever possible. It's a very well written article. I do not see any major isssues.DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 07:11, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2022_Bahrain_Grand_Prix/GA1&oldid=1249862921"