Jump to content

Talk:2019 Shanghai Masters/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 12:59, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Going to review. MWright96 (talk) 12:59, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

General

[edit]
  • All of the hyphens in the prose and references should be replaced by en dashes
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 19:27, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

[edit]
I don't see this as an improvement - Do we need the extra word? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 19:32, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Overview

[edit]

Prize fund

[edit]
  • The highest break and the total prize fund figures are not mentioned in the two sources attached to it. Another source is required to verify it

Tournament summary

[edit]

References

[edit]

Century breaks

[edit]
  • "Barry Hawkins completed the highest break of the event, a 142." - better; Barry Hawkins completed the tournament's highest break of 142 in the fourth frame of his second round match against John Higgins.

Overall there are sections of text that are not verified because they have the incorrect reference attached to it or not mentioned by the sources at all. There are also some references which are duplicates of another and prose issues are present. Will put on hold for the time being. MWright96 (talk) 14:06, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]