Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Radio

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Radio and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Shortcut

WT:RADIO

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 91 days

Radio

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Radio station deletions

Members of this project may be interested in a cleanup campaign proposing deletion of obscure radio station articles. I assume good faith on these proposals and don't have time to assess notability in every case. I have been suggesting these be redirected as a preferred alternative to deletion. ~Kvng (talk) 19:39, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking and capitalization of sources

I want to make sure this revert was correct. I'm not convinced. If it was correct, of course, all radio articles should be consistent. There was a "discussion" here but User:BlueboyLINY would not discuss. Also, while it is unusual capitalization, the source capitalized every word in the headline. Should I do the same?— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:13, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do you find a facility ID?

That used to be easy with the old templates. I had to add a translator today and couldn't give it a facility ID.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:28, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Michael Savage

Michael Savage has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:10, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for The Museum of Curiosity

The Museum of Curiosity has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:14, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]