Jump to content

Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Johns Hopkins University/Johns Hopkins Medicine Freshman Seminar (Spring 2017)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This Course Wikipedia Resources Connect
Questions? Ask us:

contact@wikiedu.org

Course name
Johns Hopkins Medicine Freshman Seminar
Institution
Johns Hopkins University
Instructor
Jenny Kinniff
Wikipedia Expert
Ian (Wiki Ed)
Subject
History of Science & Technology
Course dates
2017-01-30 00:00:00 UTC – 2017-05-12 23:59:59 UTC
Approximate number of student editors
30


Johns Hopkins medicine has set the standards since the late 19th century. Learn how Hopkins reinvented medical education, public health, and hospital care and meet the people behind the famous names.

Student Assigned Reviewing
Kevin duffy9 Adelaide Nutting Franklin P. Mall, Edwards A. Park
Wendytsai223 John Shaw Billings Franklin Paine Mall, Leo Kanner
Rh1324 Arthur D. Hirschfelder William Kouwenhoven, Howard Kelly
Aswett2 Hemoglobin Hopkins-2 Radial mastectomy, Arthur D. Hirschfelder
Rachelleliu Arthur D. Hirschfelder William Kouwenhoven, Hemoglobin Hopkins-2
Kpatel1214 William Kouwenhoven Adelaide Nutting, George Otto Gey
Jsong009 Radical mastectomy Max Brodel, Alfred Sommer
Lchpj555 Edwards A. Park Max Brodel, Adelaide Nutting
23penguin Leo Kanner John Shaw Billings, Franklin Paine Mall
Mchang47 Mary Garrett Leo Kanner, Frank B. Walsh
Lpeng18 Howard Kelly Arthur D. Hirschfelder, Frank B.Walsh
Jdong15 Leo Kanner John Shaw Billings, John Jacob Abel
Tingtingou Mary Garrett Max Brodel, John Jacob Abel
Jcho53 William Kouwenhoven Arthur D. Hirschfelder, Adelaide Nutting
Slu30 Franklin P. Mall Howard Kelly, John Shaw Billings
Bkim11 Max Brodel Radical mastectomy, Howard Kelly
Hty118 John Jacob Abel Mary Garrett, John Shaw Billings
Vchan10 Radical mastectomy John Jacob Abel, Mary Garrett
Pajberman Frank B. Walsh Mary Garrett
Scerpellare Max Brodel William Kouwenhoven, Mary Adelaide Nutting
Aditya P Alfred Sommer Leo Kanner, Radical mastectomy
Hewilliam7 Frank B. Walsh Franklin P. Mall, Alfred Sommer
Csong22 Howard Kelly Frank B. Walsh, Radical mastectomy
Zgoldst3 George Otto Gey Adelaide Nutting, Edwards A. Park
Aclg13 John Jacob Abel Leo Kanner, George Otto Gey
Mgroves16 George Otto Gey Mary Garrett, William Kouwenhoven
Sapphire l Hemoglobin Hopkins-2 Max Brodel, Adelaide Nutting
Ooyenus1 Adelaide Nutting Arthur D. Hirschfelder, William Kouwenhoven
Jdesai3 Alfred Sommer Radical mastectomy, Frank B. Walsh
Mpicker4 Edwards A. Park (doctor) George Otto Gey, Alfred Sommer
Wlee74 Franklin P. Mall Howard Kelly, Leo Kanner
Cmglaser47 John Shaw Billings John Jacob Abel

Timeline

Week 1

Course meetings
Monday, 30 January 2017   |   Wednesday, 1 February 2017
In class - Introduction to the Wikipedia project

Welcome to your Wikipedia project's course timeline. This page will guide you through the Wikipedia project for your course. Be sure to check with your instructor to see if there are other pages you should be following as well.

This page breaks down writing a Wikipedia article into a series of steps, or milestones. These steps include online trainings to help you get started on Wikipedia.

Your course has also been assigned a Wikipedia Content Expert. Check your Talk page for notes from them. You can also reach them through the "Get Help" button on this page.

To get started, please review the following handouts:


Assignment - Practicing the basics
  • Create an account and join this course page, using the enrollment link your instructor sent you.
  • It's time to dive into Wikipedia. Below, you'll find the first set of online trainings you'll need to take. New modules will appear on this timeline as you get to new milestones. Be sure to check back and complete them! Incomplete trainings will be reflected in your grade.
  • When you finish the trainings, practice by introducing yourself to a classmate on that classmate’s Talk page.
Milestones

This week, everyone should have a Wikipedia account.

Week 2

Course meetings
Monday, 6 February 2017   |   Wednesday, 8 February 2017
Assignment - Critique an article

It's time to think critically about Wikipedia articles. You'll evaluate a Wikipedia article, and leave suggestions for improving it on the article's Talk page.

  • Complete the "Evaluating Articles and Sources" training (linked below).
  • Choose an article, and consider some questions (but don't feel limited to these):
    • Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
    • Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
    • Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
    • Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
    • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
    • Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?
    • Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
  • Choose at least 2 questions relevant to the article you're evaluating. Leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes — ~~~~.


In class - Discussion
What's a content gap?

Now that you're thinking about what makes a "good" Wikipedia article, consider some additional questions.

  • Wikipedians often talk about "content gaps." What do you think a content gap is, and what are some possible ways to identify them?
  • What are some reasons a content gap might arise? What are some ways to remedy them?
  • Does it matter who writes Wikipedia?
  • What does it mean to be "unbiased" on Wikipedia? How is that different, or similar, to your own definition of "bias"?

Week 3

Course meetings
Monday, 13 February 2017   |   Wednesday, 15 February 2017
Assignment - Add to an article

Familiarize yourself with editing Wikipedia by adding a citation to an article. There are two ways you can do this:

  • Add 1-2 sentences to a course-related article, and cite that statement to a reliable source, as you learned in the online training.
  • The Citation Hunt tool shows unreferenced statements from articles. First, evaluate whether the statement in question is true! An uncited statement could just be lacking a reference or it could be inaccurate or misleading. Reliable sources on the subject will help you choose whether to add it or correct the statement.

Week 4

Course meetings
Monday, 20 February 2017   |   Wednesday, 22 February 2017
In class - Discussion
Thinking about sources and plagiarism
  • Blog posts and press releases are considered poor sources of reliable information. Why?
  • What are some reasons you might not want to use a company's website as the main source of information about that company?
  • What is the difference between a copyright violation and plagiarism?
  • What are some good techniques to avoid close paraphrasing and plagiarism?


Assignment - Illustrate an article

You'll want to find or create an appropriate photo, illustration, or piece of video/audio to add to an article.

  •  Before you start, review the Illustrating Wikipedia handbook, or see Editing Wikipedia pages 10–11. 
  • When you've reviewed those pages, take the training linked below.
  •  When you're ready to start finding images, remember: Never grab images you find through an image search, or those found on Instagram, Tumblr, Reddit, Imgur, or even so-called "Free image" or "free stock photo" websites. Instead, you'll want to find images with clear proof that the creator has given permission to use their work. Many of these images can be found on search.creativecommons.org
  •  Don't just upload an image to Wikipedia. Instead, upload it to Wikipedia's sister site for images, Wikimedia Commons. For instructions, read through the Illustrating Wikipedia handbook. 


Best practices for working in groups
  •  Make sure everyone in the group is assigned to the same Wikipedia article on the Students tab of this course page. 
  •  Select one group member whose Sandbox space you'll all share to draft your article. Each person should link to that shared Sandbox from their own Sandbox page. A sandbox is like any other page on Wikipedia, and anyone can edit it. 
  •  Wikipedia doesn't allow multiple people to edit from different devices at the same time. If you're working together in person, one person should add the work to the Sandbox. If you are all working independently, make small edits and save often to avoid "editing conflicts" with classmates. Make sure that you're logged in under your own Wikipedia account while editing in your classmate's sandbox to ensure your edits are recorded. 
  •  Don't create a group account for your project. Group accounts are prohibited. 


Assignment - Choose your topic / Find your sources

It's time to choose an article and assign it to yourself.

  • Review page 6 of your Editing Wikipedia guidebook.
  •  Use the Krieger Index available on the Blackboard site to help you pick a topic. Email Professor Leslie and the TA to inform them of your groups pick, along with some alternate ideas.
  •  In your sandbox, write a few sentences about what you plan to contribute to the selected article. 
    •  Think back to when you did an article critique. What can you add? Post some of your ideas to the article's talk page. 
    •  Start to compile a list of relevant, reliable books, journal articles, or other sources. Post that bibliography to the talk page of the article you'll be working on, and in your sandbox. Make sure to check in on the Talk page to see if anyone has advice on your bibliography. 

Week 5

Course meetings
Monday, 27 February 2017   |   Wednesday, 1 March 2017
Assignment - Draft your article

You've picked a topic and found your sources. Now it's time to start writing.

Creating a new article?

  •  Write an outline of that topic in the form of a standard Wikipedia article's "lead section." Write it in your sandbox
    •  A "lead" section is not a traditional introduction. It should summarize, very briefly, what the rest of the article will say in detail. The first paragraph should include important, broad facts about the subject. A good example is Ada Lovelace. See Editing Wikipedia page 9 for more ideas. 

Improving an existing article?

  •  Identify what's missing from the current form of the article. Think back to the skills you learned while critiquing an article. Make notes for improvement in your sandbox




Keep reading your sources, too, as you prepare to write the body of the article.

Resources: Editing Wikipedia pages 7–9

Milestones

Everyone has begun writing their article drafts.

Week 6

Course meetings
Monday, 6 March 2017   |   Wednesday, 8 March 2017
In class - Discussion
Thinking about Wikipedia
  • What do you think of Wikipedia's definition of "neutrality"?
  • What are the impacts and limits of Wikipedia as a source of information?
  • On Wikipedia, all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. What kinds of sources does this exclude? Can you think of any problems that might create?
  • If Wikipedia was written 100 years ago, how might its content (and contributors) be different? What about 100 years from now?


Assignment - Expand your draft
  • Keep working on transforming your article into a complete first draft. Get draft ready for peer-review. 
  • If you'd like a Content Expert to review your draft, now is the time! Click the "Get Help" button in your sandbox to request notes.


Assignment - Peer review, part 1
  • First, take the "Peer Review" online training.
  •  Select a classmates’ article that you will peer review and copyedit. On the Articles tab, find the article that you want to review, and then assign it to yourself in the Review column. 
  •  Peer review your classmate's draft. Leave suggestions on the Talk page of the article, or sandbox, that your fellow student is working on. Other editors may be reviewing your work, so look for their comments! Be sure to acknowledge feedback from other Wikipedians. 
  • Consider - is the article covering topics in a well-balanced manner? Is the tone encyclopedic? Are there additional sections, images, or links which the article should include?

Week 7

Course meetings
Monday, 13 March 2017   |   Wednesday, 15 March 2017
Assignment - Respond to your peer review, and continue working on your draft

You probably have some feedback from other students and possibly other Wikipedians. It's time to work with that feedback to improve your article!

  • Read Editing Wikipedia pages 12 and 14.
  •  Return to your draft or article and think about the suggestions. Decide which ones to start implementing. Incorporate the suggestions into your work. Reach out to your instructor or your Content Expert if you have any questions. 

Week 8

Course meetings
Monday, 27 March 2017   |   Wednesday, 29 March 2017
Assignment - Peer review part 2
  • Select a *different* classmates’ article that you will peer review and copyedit. On the Articles tab, find the article that you want to review, and then assign it to yourself in the Review column.
  • Peer review your classmate's draft. Leave suggestions on the Talk page of the article, or sandbox, that your fellow student is working on. Other editors may be reviewing your work, so look for their comments! Be sure to acknowledge feedback from other Wikipedians. 
  • As you review, make spelling, grammar, and other adjustments. Pay attention to the tone of the article. Is it encyclopedic? 
  • Think about the sources the article is using. Are they appropriate? Is the article not relying too heavily on any one source? Have the sources been correctly cited?


Week 9

Course meetings
Monday, 3 April 2017   |   Wednesday, 5 April 2017
In class - Begin moving your work to Wikipedia

 Once you've made improvements to your article based on peer review feedback, it's time to move your work to Wikipedia proper - the "mainspace." 

Editing an existing article?

  • NEVER copy and paste your draft of an article over the entire article. Instead, edit small sections at a time.
  • Copy your edits into the article. Make many small edits, saving each time, and leaving an edit summary. Never replace more than one to two sentences without saving!

Creating a new article?


Assignment - Continue improving your article

Do additional research and writing to make further improvements to your article, based on suggestions and your own critique.

  •  Read Editing Wikipedia page 12 to see how to create links from your article to others, and from other articles to your own. Try to link to 3–5 articles, and link to your article from 2–3 other articles. 

Week 10

Course meetings
Monday, 10 April 2017   |   Wednesday, 12 April 2017
Assignment - Continue improving your article

Do additional research and writing to make further improvements to your article, based on suggestions and your own critique.

Add an image from wikicommons to your article. 

Assignment - Continue moving your article to Wikipedia

 Once you've made improvements to your article based on peer review feedback, it's time to move your work to Wikipedia proper - the "mainspace." 

Editing an existing article?

  • NEVER copy and paste your draft of an article over the entire article. Instead, edit small sections at a time.
  • Copy your edits into the article. Make many small edits, saving each time, and leaving an edit summary. Never replace more than one to two sentences without saving!

Creating a new article?

Week 11

Course meetings
Monday, 17 April 2017   |   Wednesday, 19 April 2017
Assignment - Polish your work

 Continue to expand and improve your work, and format your article to match Wikipedia's tone and standards. Remember to contact your Content Expert at any time if you need further help! 

Assignment - Get Caught Up

Check blackboard to see if there are assignments you've missed in past weeks that could be completed. Email the TA for clarification if it's not clear what you've missed.

Week 12

Course meetings
Monday, 24 April 2017   |   Wednesday, 26 April 2017
Assignment - Prepare for in-class presentation
  • Prepare for an in-class presentation about your Wikipedia editing experience.

Consider the following questions as you reflect on your Wikipedia assignment:

  • Critiquing articles: What did you learn about Wikipedia during the article evaluation? How did you approach critiquing the article you selected for this assignment? How did you decide what to add to your chosen article? 
  • Summarizing your contributions: include a summary of your edits and why you felt they were a valuable addition to the article. How does your article compare to earlier versions? 
  • Peer Review: If your class did peer review, include information about the peer review process. What did you contribute in your review of your peers article? What did your peers recommend you change on your article? 
  • Feedback: Did you receive feedback from other Wikipedia editors, and if so, how did you respond to and handle that feedback? 
  • Wikipedia generally: What did you learn from contributing to Wikipedia? How does a Wikipedia assignment compare to other assignments you've done in the past? How can Wikipedia be used to improve public understanding of our field/your topic? Why is this important? 

Week 13

Course meetings
Monday, 1 May 2017   |   Wednesday, 3 May 2017
In class - In-class presentation

Present about your Wikipedia editing experience.

Consider the following questions as you reflect on your Wikipedia assignment:

  • Critiquing articles: What did you learn about Wikipedia during the article evaluation? How did you approach critiquing the article you selected for this assignment? How did you decide what to add to your chosen article? 
  • Summarizing your contributions: include a summary of your edits and why you felt they were a valuable addition to the article. How does your article compare to earlier versions? 
  • Peer Review: If your class did peer review, include information about the peer review process. What did you contribute in your review of your peers article? What did your peers recommend you change on your article? 
  • Feedback: Did you receive feedback from other Wikipedia editors, and if so, how did you respond to and handle that feedback? 
  • Wikipedia generally: What did you learn from contributing to Wikipedia? How does a Wikipedia assignment compare to other assignments you've done in the past? How can Wikipedia be used to improve public understanding of our field/your topic? Why is this important? 


Assignment - Final article

It's the final week to develop your article.

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 15 to review a final check-list before completing your assignment.
  • Don't forget that you can ask for help from your Content Expert at any time!
Milestones

Everyone should have finished all of the work they'll do on Wikipedia, and be ready for grading.