Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Samuel Frickleton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article promoted by Kges1901 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 12:20, 10 January 2019 (UTC) « Return to A-Class review list[reply]

Instructions for nominators and reviewers

Nominator(s): Zawed (talk)

Samuel Frickleton (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Another article in the series I've been working on for New Zealand Victoria Cross recipients of the First World War, Samuel Frickleton was actually Scottish-born and earned his VC at the Battle of Messines in 1917. The article went through a GA review in mid-2018. I look forward to the feedback of reviewers and, all going well, seeing this article be promoted to A-Class. Zawed (talk) 04:29, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CommentsSupport:

  • Born in 1891 in Scotland, Frickleton was a miner when he enlisted with the New Zealand Expeditionary Force (NZEF) Makes it sound like he enlisted in the NZDF from Scotland
  • However, his health was still poor and before the end of the war was returned to New Zealand His health was returned to NZ? ;) Also, "however" is frowned upon by some at FAC; I usually recommend rewording when it's easy to do.
  • Wounded during the action that earned him the VC But you don't tell us what the action was...
  • In 1956, he was one of 400 VC winners who paraded in Hyde Park in London For the VC centenary? This is mentioned in the lead but not the body.

Excellent work again. I can't see anything that would bar promotion. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:13, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

HJ Mitchell: thanks for the feedback, I have made edits as per your suggestions. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 22:01, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Happy to support now. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:40, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from AustralianRupert - Support: G'day, Zawed, just a few minor comments/observations from me: AustralianRupert (talk) 08:49, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • there are no duplicate links, or dabs (no action required)
  • ext links all work (no action required)
  • images lack alt text, suggest adding this in as it can help some readers: [1]
  • are there any details of his schooling available?
  • following the death of his father: do we know how he died?
  • suggest wikilinking "officer"
  • and served as Inspector, New Zealand Military Forces --> "and served as Inspector, New Zealand Military Forces serving on the home front for the duration of the Second World War"?
  • Frickleton died in 1971 in Wellington --> suggest adding the full date of his death here

Image review

  • Nikkimaria: not sure of date of publication of that particular image but suspect it could have been in 1937 as part of the publicity surrounding his selection for attendance at the 1937 Coronation. I could replace it with this image: [2], which was executed in 1920 and released by Archives New Zealand under a cc-by-sa-2.0 licence. Zawed (talk) 22:43, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Comments & Support from Pendright - Pendright (talk) 21:30, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

[edit]
The following comments are intended to help make a good article better, so please take them in this light. If you disagree with any of them, I expect we can iron-out any issues in a good-natured manner.Pendright (talk) 02:28, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Lead
[edit]

Samuel Frickleton, VC, ED (1 April 1891 – 6 August 1971) was a soldier in the New Zealand Military Forces and recipient of the Victoria Cross (VC), the highest award of the British Commonwealth for gallantry in "the face of the enemy. He was awarded the VC for his actions in he Battle of Messiness during the First Wirld War.

Samuel Frickleton, VC, ED
  • You've described the VC at some length, but only introduced the Efficiency Decoration award as ED?
Let’s think about the reader (isn’t that what this is all about), who has to go to another site to find out what the ED actually means. Is this reader friendly? Besides, the entire paragraph is only about 40 words in length – it could stand a bump in words. And, as we are all remaindered, if it’s in the body we expect to find it in the lead, or vice versa. Pendright (talk) 01:45, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I've added recited the ED in full in the lead. Zawed (talk) 06:29, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Under Abbreviations, the MOS seems to suggest that they are used only after first being written out. While there are some exemptions, awards do not seem to be one of them.
  • Can you point to something that says otherwise?
In this case, can you be more specific! Pendright (talk) 02:58, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The first usage is as a post-nominal. Post-nominals aren't written out in full on first usage. Zawed (talk) 06:29, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
and recipient of the Victoria Cross (VC),
  • Consider adding the indefinite article a in front of the noun recipient
You said, I don’t believe this [use of the indefinite article] is done for the VC -
Yet, in this response you’ve applied (correctly) the definite article (the) to VC. , But oppose using the indefinite article (a) for recipient. It’s a small matter, I know, but still has its importance in the scheme of things. Pendright (talk) 01:52, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I misunderstood the original point (I thought you were wanting to refer to "a VC"). Have revised. Zawed (talk) 06:29, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"the face of the enemy"

  • For emphasis, the MOS suggests using italics.
The MOS also states that if quotations marks are used, attribution is required. Pendright (talk) 03:23, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Have deleted the quote marks. Zawed (talk) 06:29, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
First World War
  • Consider linking!

Born in 1891 in Scotland, Frickleton was a miner when he enlisted with the New Zealand Expeditionary Force (NZEF) the year after the outbreak of the First World War. He took ill on reaching the Middle East and had to be repatriated to New Zealand. Although he had been discharged from the NZEF, he rejoined after recovering his health. He was posted to the 3rd Battalion, New Zealand Rifle Brigade, then serving on the Western Front. Wounded during the action that earned him the VC, he received medical treatment in England after which he underwent officer training. However, his health was still poor and before the end of the war was returned to New Zealand. He later served in the New Zealand Staff Corps. He went to London in 1937 for the coronation of King George VI and Queen Elizabeth and again nearly 20 years later for the VC centenary. He served on the home front during the Second World War. He died in 1971 at the age of 80.

Born in 1891 in Scotland, Frickleton was a miner when he enlisted with the New Zealand Expeditionary Force (NZEF)
  • While a reader might assume he migrated from Scotland to New Zealand, it might be better to say so.
  • An under aged person is a minor
Frickleton: The subject's proper name is used once in the first sentence, then substituted with he or his for the rest of paragraph.
  • Consider some variation
  • As a style thing, I generally only mention the name once in a paragraph. I have split the lead into three now so mentioned his name again.
Second World War
  • Consider linking

Observations:

  • The abbrevaition VC is mentioned three times in the firat paragraph and twice in the second.
  • I have edited the lead to drop one mention.
  • The lead shaes little of Frickleton's personal life - other than miliary.
Early life
[edit]

Frickleton was born on 1 April 1891 in Slamannan in Scotland,

  • Consider replacing the second in with a comma

I recognize how difficult it is to find sources for this kind of artile

  • Perhaps you still could squeeze out a few more facts to help bolster this small section

In progress: Pendright (talk) 02:28, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

First World War
[edit]

The Middle East and France

  • Are they worthty of linking?

the rank of corporal

  • In most places of the world rank is reserved for officers
Perhaps it's just semantics! Pendright (talk) 05:28, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Second paragraph: you have the subject promoted to corporal twice?
Consider this for clarity:
After a period of convalescence, he re-enlisted [as a private] for the NZEF in 1916.[2] Later that year, he was posted to France as a rifleman in the 3rd Battalion, New Zealand Rifle Brigade. By March 1917, he had been promoted to corporal. Pendright (talk) 02:35, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is not quite straightforward since a rifleman is equivalent in rank to a private. Have revised to make this clearer. Zawed (talk) 06:57, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And was badly gassed

  • Is this clear enough for the average reader?
Later life and legacy
[edit]

Third sentence: on 7 June 2007, a plaque

  • Would read smoother without the comma, specially with a semi-colon before the word on
Observation: While the VC is imortant to the story, it seems to be mentioned in the text an inordinate number of times.
  • Yes, it is a reflection of what made him notable. I would like to expand on his life, particularly post WWII (he would have only been approaching his late 50s), but there is little in the sources. Zawed (talk) 08:57, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Finished - Pendright (talk) 04:28, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pendright, thank you for taking the time to review the article, it is always good to have as many eyes as possible on an article to ensure all its kinks are ironed out. I have responded to your various points as above. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 08:57, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pendright, it looks like I misunderstood at least one of your comments, my apologies. I have responded above to each of the outstanding comments. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 06:59, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Zawed: No apology necessary! Thank you for your promptness and cooperation. Happy to support - Pendright (talk) 21:30, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Source review

[edit]

All the sources seem reliable and of high quality. Although there doesn't seem to be a wide range of sources on him, that is common for VC recipients who are not otherwise notable. Formatting seems OK. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:22, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.