Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Lesueurs Frog09.jpg

Lesueur's Frog

I've already had an unsuccessful FPC nomination of this species, but I think this image is definitely better than the other two I nominated previously. Good sharpness, interesting context (in water) and all areas of the frog are visible.

Support Self Nom. --Fir0002 06:15, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose The front and back of the frog aren't in focus. The water on the frog's head is blown, though this probably wouldn't bother me as much if the whole frog was in focus. Looks good in thumbnail though. H4cksaw (talk) 14:10, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I disagree, I think the large version looks much better. 99DBSIMLR 14:25, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support DOF is a little small (right hind leg) but the focus on the body of the frog is outstanding. The lighting on the head looks like its from a flash but it's avery nice picture. -Fcb981 15:34, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Frog's body is amazing, great detail - but not one of four limbs is entirely in focus... tiZom_(2¢) 20:03, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice , best of your frog pics thus far, clear. ~ Arjun 20:04, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This picture is way off your usual standard, Fir, because too much of the image is not in focus - Adrian Pingstone 21:28, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose Frogs seem to be a challenge for you Fir. You've been getting beautiful insect photos of late, but the frogs aren't keeping up. I am mainly opposing for the focus problems. Compared to current frog FPs, this isn't that great. Just as a note, this is a weird specimen. The blotched back and thin line (it's usually much thicker) through the eye are unusual for this frog. --liquidGhoul 00:49, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Support There is not one bit of criteria that it doesn't pass. This is an excellent picture!!!--γιατί ^{Sign Here | ESP.} 03:27, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nicely done. :) ♥Tohru Honda13♥ 04:21, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per DOF issues, I love the pic though --⁪froth^T 08:29, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted , although close. Raven4x4x 01:15, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]