Jump to content

Talk:Ramblin' Wreck from Georgia Tech/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Reassessment

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:40, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Two citation needed tags are outstanding from July 2009  Done
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Just 2 citation needed tags need addressing. On hold for seven days, major contributors and projects will be notified. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:49, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looked for sources and couldn't find them, so removed the statements. Technically this fixes the issue. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 03:52, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that is good enough for me, keep GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 04:09, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry that I wasn't able to take care of this earlier. It looks like Wizardman did what I would have done, given that we can't find sources for those things. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 17:30, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]