Talk:Muppies

Islam Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 30 July 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Adumbrativus (talk) 05:44, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Muppies – Muslim Urban Professionals → Muppies – The current exact name, with formatting/whitespace, is an unlikely search-term. Although their website does use this in the header, they seem to use the short-form Muppies universally on the pages except that place where explaining what the term means. For conciseness and commonname, I propose renaming it to simply "Muppies". Alternately, I could live with "Muslim Urban Professionals", being its full expanded name that might be more self-defining. The article has previously been at both locations over the years, so I'm taking a discuss-not-bold route to get some further input. DMacks (talk) 00:00, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. But I would question whether we should have an article on this organisation at all. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:40, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is a very good question. DMacks (talk) 16:46, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.