Jump to content

Talk:List of National Historic Landmarks in Montana

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Other discussion pages

[edit]

18-March-2009: (subtopic) Discussions of all NHL-lists, for all 50 states, have specific pages:

Specifics for the Montana NHL-list are below. -Wikid77 (talk) 18:24, 18 March 2009

Butte Post Office

[edit]

Is there evidence that the Butte Post Office (now the Federal Court House) is separately listed as a NHL? I don't think it is... it is a separately listed National Register property, but I'm pretty sure the only separate NHL within Butte is the Burton K. Wheeler House. Likewise, Ft. Union is not a designated NHL on the Federal List of 23; it is a National Historic Site, which is a bit different. Cheers Geologyguy 21:37, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality rating of this list-table article for WP:NRHP

[edit]

Nice work, Geologyguy and others. Per discussion at Talk page of WP:NRHP of what should warrant Stub/Start/B/FL class rating for a list-table, I think this article merits "Start" rating within WP:NRHP, because:

  1. It is a "useful" list in the sense required in WP:WIAFL
  2. It is factually accurate as far as it goes. Support for all facts about NHLs within are supported by the corresponding articles, I think.
  3. It is comprehensive, listing all the NHLs in MT.
  4. There should not be controversy about its scope, it is a factual matter what sites are NHLs and which are not.
  5. It displays photos of some of its items
  6. There is an article of at least Stub class for every item on the list.
  7. Reference supporting completeness (first External link) is provided.

I am going ahead and giving the article Start rating now. doncram 16:49, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on List of National Historic Landmarks in Montana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:04, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on List of National Historic Landmarks in Montana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:59, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]