Jump to content

Talk:James T. Aubrey

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:James T. Aubrey, Jr.)
Featured articleJames T. Aubrey is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 19, 2006.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 6, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
February 19, 2006Today's featured articleMain Page
February 13, 2008Featured article reviewKept
Current status: Featured article

Comments

[edit]

Reference from the article: "His outsize reputation--beaming smile, dapper dress, endless womanizing--inspired no less than three novelists to model characters after him: Keefe Brasselle, Harold Pinter, and Jacqueline Susann. (Aubrey is network executive Robin Stone in Susann's The Love Machine.)"

I've heard a rumor that he was also the inspiration for the comic book character Morgan Edge (who appeared in Superman comics in the 70's and 80's as the owner of GBS) created by the legendary Jack Kirby. I can't verify it so I thought I'd put it here instead of in the article.

  • Never heard this story. If you could give me a citation for this, either printed or on-line, I'd like to add it. PedanticallySpeaking 20:33, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
Here's a site that mentions it http://supermanthrutheages.com/dcmb/seventies/?part=21, and it attributes it to THE JACK KIRBY COLLECTOR #32.
Here's another site that mentions it, but it doesn't document it http://comics.ign.com/articles/595/595577p4.html
Also, Clark refers to Edge as "The Smiling Cobra" (Aubrey's nickname) on the first page of the second story for Action Comics #477. This nickname may be used for Edge in other stories as well.--198.93.113.49 14:34, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)


Fair use rationale for Image:Abc57.jpg

[edit]

Image:Abc57.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:05, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Closing, overall integration of anecdotes and details examination

[edit]

The article may have well captured the hard edge of this entertainment business character, but this general success does not justify intermittently switching from encyclopedic structure and tone to that of a Variety or EW piece for sake of impact. In this vein, the current closing line needs to be attributed as a quote, or be scrapped as an unverifiable negative. Then, article needs further standard biographical elements, including a personal life section at close. Instead of saying/suggesting "what a forgettable b_____d", accurately give his end of life facts, and present quotes from his obituary. When did he actually cease work? Where did he live in retirement? Spouse, children, other legacy elements? As it ends, it seems a spiteful pulp magazine piece. (Apparently he was remembered well enough to still get a full NYT article at his passing, see [1].)

At the same time, other details can be examined for consistency. While each bit of sourced quotation/information appearing may be verifiable, it does not mean it accurately portrays a consistent historical picture. The Garland references are one example, where the fact that Aubrey's interactions with Garland over her television content and scheduling were adversarial (alluded to, passingly); however, the article then also quotes Aubrey as saying his divorce was prompted by his associations with women such as… Garland. When there are contrary themes/statements, journalist practice of corroborating sources have to apply. (The latter suggestion, even if properly sourced, that Garland in any contributed to Aubrey's divorce, is incongruous with all other information regarding these two from this period, and should have been omitted or qualified.)

As central as Aubrey was in the lives and prospects of screen and television personalities for many decades, for good or for bad, the many references to him in the various relevant good, independent biographies have to be crosschecked to get to a consistent picture. Antithetical statements cannot be simply strung together, despite being at odds, with this article remaining anything that approaches an encyclopedic treatment of this man. 71.239.87.100 (talk) 00:11, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

James T. Aubrey page title

[edit]

His WP:Common name was James T. Aubrey, as seen in most press accounts. The page should be moved to that. - Gothicfilm (talk) 09:46, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:James T. Aubrey/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

needs inline citations --plange 21:15, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Substituted at 18:03, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on James T. Aubrey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:47, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]